Persistence Capital Skips Lenskart IPO Amid ₹70,000 Crore Valuation Debate and Investor Scepticism

Lenskart IPO

In a move that has stirred debate across India’s capital markets, alternative investment fund Persistence Capital publicly announced its decision to skip participation in the high-profile initial public offering (IPO) of eyewear retailer Lenskart. The fund’s candid disclosure, made via a post on X (formerly Twitter), has added fuel to the ongoing conversation around inflated valuations and shifting investor sentiment in the consumer-tech IPO space.

Lenskart, led by CEO Peyush Bansal, launched its ₹7,278 crore IPO on October 31, 2025, with a price band of ₹382–₹402 per share. The company is seeking a market capitalization of ₹70,000 crore, translating into a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of over 230x and a price-to-sales ratio exceeding 10x. These figures have raised eyebrows among analysts and retail investors, many of whom have drawn comparisons to past IPO misfires such as Paytm’s 2021 listing.

📊 Lenskart IPO Snapshot

IPO MetricValue
Total Issue Size₹7,278 crore
Fresh Issue₹2,150 crore
Offer for Sale (OFS)₹5,128 crore
Price Band₹382–₹402 per share
Target Valuation₹70,000 crore
P/E Ratio~230x
Listing DateNovember 10, 2025

The valuation has sparked widespread debate about the sustainability of consumer-tech IPOs in India.

🧠 Persistence Capital’s Statement and Market Reaction

EntityResponse Summary
Persistence Capital“We are proud to say that we also skipped this IPO.”
Market AnalystsMixed views; some call valuation “obscene”
Retail InvestorsConfused by high multiples
Social Media UsersCompared to Shark Tank irony and Paytm IPO

The fund’s refusal to participate was seen as a symbolic rejection of inflated valuations.

🗣️ Peyush Bansal’s Defense of Valuation

In response to criticism, Lenskart CEO Peyush Bansal stated, “My job is to create value, not just justify numbers. We are building a long-term business.” He emphasized the company’s growth trajectory, omnichannel strategy, and international expansion as key drivers of future profitability.

Justification AreaPeyush Bansal’s Argument
Store NetworkOver 2,600 stores across India
Global PresenceExpansion into UAE, Singapore, and US
Tech IntegrationAI-powered lens fitting and supply chain
Subscription ModelLenskart Gold and Vision Plans

Despite the defense, many investors remain unconvinced about the valuation metrics.

📈 Industry Comparisons and Valuation Benchmarks

CompanyIPO YearValuation (₹ Cr)P/E RatioOutcome
Nykaa2021₹53,000~160xMixed performance
Paytm2021₹1,39,000NASharp decline
Zomato2021₹60,000NAVolatile
Lenskart2025₹70,000~230xUnder scrutiny

Lenskart’s valuation exceeds most of its consumer-tech peers, raising concerns about listing-day performance.

🧭 Investor Sentiment and Grey Market Premium Trends

DateGMP (%)Market Sentiment Summary
October 2827%Optimism among early traders
October 2918%Valuation concerns begin surfacing
October 3016.5%GMP drops amid scepticism
October 3114%Retail investors cautious

The falling GMP reflects growing unease about the IPO’s pricing and future returns.

🧠 Broader Implications for Consumer-Tech IPOs

Concern AreaIndustry Impact
Valuation DisciplinePush for realistic pricing models
Institutional ParticipationFunds becoming selective
Retail Investor ProtectionNeed for better disclosures
Regulatory OversightSEBI may tighten IPO norms

Persistence Capital’s move may signal a shift toward more conservative investment strategies in India’s IPO market.

📌 Conclusion

The Lenskart IPO has become a flashpoint in India’s consumer-tech investment narrative, with Persistence Capital’s public rejection amplifying concerns over valuation excesses. While Peyush Bansal remains confident in the company’s long-term vision, the market’s response underscores a growing demand for transparency, realistic pricing, and sustainable growth. As the IPO heads toward listing, all eyes will be on how Lenskart performs and whether it can justify its lofty valuation in the public markets.

Disclaimer: This article is based on publicly available financial disclosures, investor statements, and media reports. It is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *